Psychology Wiki

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Biological: Behavioural genetics · Evolutionary psychology · Neuroanatomy · Neurochemistry · Neuroendocrinology · Neuroscience · Psychoneuroimmunology · Physiological Psychology · Psychopharmacology (Index, Outline)

A cell undergoing apoptosis. In just one of many scenarios of apoptosis, the process is triggered by another neighboring cell; the dying cell eventually transmits signals that tell the phagocytes, which are a part of the immune system, to engulf it.

In biology, apoptosis (from the Greek words apo = from and ptosis = falling, commonly pronounced ap-a-tow'-sis[1]) is one of the main types of programmed cell death (PCD). As such, it is a process of deliberate life relinquishment by a cell in a multicellular organism. In contrast to necrosis, which is a form of cell death that results from acute cellular injury, apoptosis is carried out in an ordered process that generally confers advantages during an organism's life cycle. For example, the differentiation of human fingers in a developing embryo requires the cells between the fingers to initiate apoptosis so that the fingers can separate. The way the apoptotic process is executed facilitates the safe disposal of cell corpses and fragments.

Since the beginning of the 1990s, research on apoptosis has grown spectacularly. In addition to its importance as a biological phenomenon, defective apoptotic processes have been implicated in an extensive variety of diseases. Too much apoptosis causes cell-loss disorders, whereas too little results in uncontrolled cell proliferation, namely cancerous tumors.

Not all forms of PCD share the characteristic shapes (the morphology) and sequences of apoptosis, but all types of PCD are highly regulated processes.

Functions of apoptosis

Cell damage or infection

Apoptosis can occur, for instance, when a cell is damaged beyond repair, or infected with a virus. The "decision" for apoptosis can come from the cell itself, from its surrounding tissue or from a cell that is part of the immune system.

If a cell's capability of apoptosis is damaged (for example, by mutation), or if the initiation of apoptosis is blocked (by a virus), a damaged cell can continue dividing without restrictions, developing into cancer. For example, as part of the hijacking of the cell's genetic system carried out by papillomaviruses, a gene called E6 is expressed in a product that degrades p53 protein, which is a vital piece of the apoptotic pathway. This severe interference in the apoptotic capability of cells plays a critical role in the fact that persistent infection by oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPVs) can result in the development of cervical cancer.

Response to stress or DNA damage

Stress conditions, such as starvation, as well as damage to the cell's DNA resulting from toxicity or exposure to ultraviolet or ionizing radiation, such as gamma rays or X-rays, can induce a cell to begin an apoptotic process. A fascinating example, resulting from damage to the genome in the cell nucleus, is apoptosis triggered by the nuclear enzyme poly ADP ribose polymerase-1, or PARP-1. This enzyme plays a crucial role in maintaining genomic integrity, and, interestingly, massive activation of PARP-1 can deplete the cell of energy-providing molecules (called ATP), which may switch the mode of cell death to necrosis (a very messy form of non-programmed cell death).


In the adult organism, the number of cells within an organ or tissue has to be constant within a certain range. Blood and skin cells, for instance, are constantly renewed by their respective progenitor cells; but proliferation has to be compensated by cell death. This balancing process is part of the homeostasis required by living organisms to maintain their internal states within certain limits. Some authors and researchers like Steven Rose and Antonio Damasio have suggested homeodynamics as a more accurate and eloquent term (Damasio 1999, p. 141). The related term allostasis reflects a balance of a more complex nature by the body.

Between 50 billion and 70 billion cells die each day due to apoptosis in the average human adult. In a year, this amounts to the proliferation and subsequent destruction of a mass of cells equal to an individual's body weight.

Homeostasis is achieved when the rate of mitosis (cell proliferation) in the tissue is balanced by cell death. If this equilibrium is disturbed, either of two things happen:

  • The cells are dividing faster than they die, effectively developing a tumor.
  • The cells are dividing slower than they die, which results in a disorder of cell loss.

Both states can be fatal or highly damaging.

For instance, misregulation of hedgehog signaling (see Development, below) has been implicated in several forms of cancer. The hedgehog pathway, which conveys an anti-apoptotic signal, has been found to be activated in pancreatic adenocarcinoma tissues.


Programmed cell death is an integral part of both plant and metazoan (multicellular animals) tissue development. It does not resemble the sort of reaction that comes as a result of tissue damage due to accident or pathogenic infection (cell death by necrosis). Instead of swelling and bursting - hence spilling their possibly damaging internal contents into extracellular space - apoptotic cells and their nuclei shrink, and often fragment. In this way, they can be efficiently phagocytosed (and, as a consequence of this, their components reused) by macrophages or by neighboring cells.

Research on chick embryos - specifically on chick neural tube development - has suggested how selective cell proliferation, combined with selective apoptosis, sculpts developing tissues in vertebrates. During vertebrate embryo development, structures called the notochord and the floor plate secrete a gradient of the signaling molecule Sonic hedgehog (Shh), and it is this gradient that directs cells to form patterns in the embryonic neural tube: Cells that receive Shh in a receptor in their membranes called Patched1 (Ptc1) survive and proliferate; but, in the absence of Shh, one of the ends of this same Ptc1 receptor (the carboxyl-terminal, inside the membrane) is cleaved by caspase-3, an action that exposes an apoptosis-producing domain (see the Perspective by Isabel Guerrero and Ariel Ruiz i Altaba [2] and the research report by Chantal Thibert et al.[3]).

Research like the one carried out by Thibert and her colleagues has begun to clarify some of the fundamental aspects of morphogenesis, or the development of organisms from fertilized eggs to fully-developed animals and plants. It has also suggested specific answers to why normal cells carry out apoptosis when they end up outside the places they should be in body tissues.

Immune cell regulation

B cells and T cells are sophisticated — and very effective — front-line players in the body's defenses against infectious agents, as well as against local cells that have acquired or developed a malignancy. In order to carry out their job, B and T cells must have the ability to discriminate "self" from "nonself," and "healthy" from "unhealthy," antigens (protein segments that make a good fit, like a key and a lock, with specialized receptors in B and T cell membranes). For instance, "killer" T cells can be activated when presented with fragments of inappropriately expressed proteins (resulting, say, from a malignant mutation) or with foreign antigens produced as a consequence of a viral infection. After becoming activated, they migrate out of the lymph nodes in which they reside, proliferate, recognize the affected cells and commit them to programmed cell death.

The receptors in immature B and T cell membranes are not tailored precisely to coincide with "known" antigens. Rather, they are generated through a highly variable process that results in an immense variety, capable of making a good fit with an astounding number of precise molecular shapes. This means that most of these immature cells can be either ineffective (because the almost random shapes of their receptors do not engage any antigen of significance) or dangerous to their own organism, because their receptors could make a good molecular fit with healthy self antigens. If they were to be let loose without any further processing, many could become autoreactive and attack healthy body cells. The way the immune system regulates this process is by "deleting" both the ineffective and the potentially damaging immature cells via apoptosis.

As has just been described in the previous section on development, all tissue in multicellular animals depends on continuous receipt of survival signals. In the case of T cells, as they develop and mature in the thymus, the survival signal depends on their capability to engage foreign antigens. Those that fail in this test, amounting to about 97% of the freshly-produced T cells, are committed to programmed cell death. The survivors are tested as well for potentially damaging autoimmune reactions, and those that show high affinity to healthy self antigens are killed via apoptosis.

Be aware that such a portrayal presents a highly simplified picture: The actual process in which B and T cells are driven to proliferation, differentiation or apoptosis comprises a complex interplay between positive and negative regulators.

Apoptotic process


A cell undergoing apoptosis shows a characteristic morphology that can be seen under a microscope:

  1. The cell becomes round (circular). This occurs because the protein structures that conform the cytoskeleton are digested by specialized peptidases (called caspases) that have been activated inside the cell.
  2. Chromatin (DNA and its packaging proteins in the cell nucleus) undergoes initial degradation and condensation (see the article by Madeleine Kihlmark et al., in [4]).
  3. Chromatin undergoes further condensation into compact patches against the nuclear envelope. At this stage, the double membrane that surrounds the nucleus still appears complete; however, as observed by Kihlmark and colleagues, specialized caspases have already advanced in the degradation of nuclear pore proteins and have begun to degrade the lamin that underlies the nuclear envelope. It must be noted, also, that while the previous stage of initial chromatin condensation has been observed in nonapoptotic forms of programmed cell death, this advanced stage (called pyknosis) is considered a hallmark of apoptosis. [5]
  4. The nuclear envelope becomes discontinuous and the DNA inside it is fragmented (a process referred to as karyorrhexis). The nucleus breaks into several discrete chromatin bodies or nucleosomal units due to the degradation of DNA [6].
  5. Plasma membrane blebbings.
  6. The cell is phagocytosed, or
  7. The cell breaks apart into several vesicles called apoptotic bodies, which are then phagocytosed.

Biochemical signals for safe disposal

Dying cells that undergo the final stages of apoptosis, display "eat me" signals, like phosphatidylserine (PS), on the cell surface. Phosphatidylserine is normally found on the cytosolic (inner) surface of the plasma membrane, but is redistributed during apoptosis to the extracellular surface by a hypothetical protein known as scramblase. Phagocytic scavengers, such as macrophages, have specialized receptors that recognize PS. Removal of dying cells by phagocytes occurs in an orderly manner without eliciting an inflammatory response [7], [8].

In studies on mouse embryos lacking PS receptors conducted by Ming O. Li and colleagues [9], un-ingested cells undergoing apoptosis accumulated in the brain and lungs, leading to neonatal lethality (infant death). However, another group that deleted the same gene found no abnormality in cell death, so developing the question whether this gene really does encode the PS receptor, rather than a nuclear localized transcription factor [10].

In another study by Rikinari Hanayama and colleagues[11], milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8 (MFG-E8) was found to bind to phosphatidylserine on apoptotic cells and help macrophages to engulf such cells. Tingible body macrophages highly express MFG-E8 on their plasma membranes. Mice lacking MFG-E8 exhibited a decrease in phagocytosis of apoptotic cells, leading to an extreme increase in the production of IgG autoantibodies[12].

Intrinsic and extrinsic inducers

Apoptotic messages from outside the cell (called extrinsic inducers) will be described in the next section, on biochemical execution of apoptosis.

Apoptotic messages from inside the cell (intrinsic inducers) are a response to stress, such as nutrient deprivation or DNA damage, as explained by Chiarugi and Moskowitz in their previously-mentioned article on PARP-1.

Both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways have in common the activation of central effectors of apoptosis, a group of cysteine proteases called caspases, which carry out the cleaving of both structural and functional elements of the cell, resulting in the previously-described morphological changes.

Biochemical execution

Caspases are normally suppressed by IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis) proteins [13]. When a cell receives an apoptotic stimulus, IAP activity is relieved after SMAC (Second Mitochondria-derived Activator of Caspases) a mitochondrial protein, is released into the cytosol. SMAC binds to IAPs, and in doing so "inhibits the inhibitors," effectively preventing them from arresting the apoptotic process.

But, before we go on to a short description of how SMAC is released, we must take a look at two much-studied extrinsically-induced apoptotic processes: the TNF and the Fas pathways. Keep in mind, however, that both activating and inhibiting factors are present at each step of these pathways.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF), a 157-amino acid intercellular signaling molecule (cytokine), is produced mainly by activated macrophages, and is the major extrinsic mediator of apoptosis. The cell membrane has two specialized receptors for TNF: TNF-R1 and TNF-R2. The binding of TNF to TNF-R1 has been shown to fire-off the pathway that leads to activating the caspases [14].

Fas (also known as Apo-1 or CD95), is another receptor of extrinsic apoptotic signals in the cell membrane, and belongs to the TNF receptor superfamily [15]. The Fas ligand (FasL, the protein that binds to Fas and activates the Fas pathway) is a transmembrane protein, and is part of the TNF family. The interaction between Fas and FasL results in the formation of the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), which contains the Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD) and caspases 8 and 10. In some types of cells (type I), processed caspase-8 directly activates other members of the caspase family, and triggers the execution of apoptosis; whereas, in other types of cells (type II), the Fas DISC starts a feed-back loop that spirals into increasing release of pro-apoptotic factors from mitochondria (see below), and the amplified activation of caspase-8.

Downstream from TNF-R1 and Fas activation - at least in mammalian cells - a balance between pro- (like BAX, BID, or BAD) and anti-apoptotic (Bcl-Xl and Bcl-2) members of the Bcl-2 family is compromised. This balance is the proportion of pro-apoptotic homodimers that form in the outer-membrane of the mitochondrion. The homodimers (of molecules like BAK and BAX) are required in order to make the mitochondrial membrane permeable for the release of caspase activators. Just how BAX and BAK are controlled under the normal conditions of cells that are not undergoing apoptosis is incompletely understood. But it has been found that a mitochondrial outer-membrane protein, VDAC2, interacts with BAK to keep this potentially-lethal apoptotic effector under control. When the death signal is received, products of the activation cascade - such as tBID, BIM or BAD - displace VDAC2: BAK and BAX are activated, and the mitochondrial outer-membrane becomes permeable; it is seen that these members of the Bcl-2 family have a pore-forming domain, resulting in the release of caspase activators, namely cytochrome c [16], [17]., but other molecules like SMAC or AIF are also released.

Once cytochrome c is released, it binds with Apaf-1 and ATP, which then binds to pro-caspase-9, creating a multi-protein complex known as apoptosome. The apoptosome cleaves this pro-caspase, rendering the active form of caspase-9, which in turn activates effector caspase-3. (See also the articles on caspases and the Bcl-2 protein family).

The whole process requires energy and a cell machinery not too damaged. If the cell damage is between certain levels, the cell can start the earliest events of apoptosis and then continue with a necrosis.

It must be advised, however, that the apoptotic pathways that have been summarily described are subject to regulatory mechanisms, and that there is not a one-to-one relationship between the reception of TNF or FasL and the complete execution of an apoptotic pathway. Fas, for instance, has been implicated - in a seemingly ironic way - in cell proliferation, through pathways that are not yet well understood; and both Fas and TNF-R1 trigger events that activate the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB), which induces the expression of genes that play an important role in diverse biological processes, including cell growth, cell death, cell development, and immune responses.

The link between TNF and apoptosis shows why an abnormal production of TNF plays a fundamental role in several human diseases, especially (but not only) in autoimmune diseases, such as diabetes and multiple sclerosis.

Implication and role of apoptosis in diverse pathologies

Apoptosis and HIV progression

The review article by Alimonti et al (2004) describes how HIV-1 causes apoptosis in bystander CD4+ T cells leading to AIDS.

Apoptosis and the role of interferon in tumor suppression

In their Nature article on the "Integration of interferon-alpha/beta signaling to p53 responses..." (see previous section on Cell damage or infection), Takaoka and co-workers have described their research on how interferon-alpha and -beta (IFN-alpha/beta) induce transcription of the p53 gene, resulting in the increase of p53 protein level and enhancement of cancer cell-apoptosis. p53 Is a tumor suppressor, and is considered as a negative-growth and anti-oncogenic factor.

Work carried out by Takaoka and colleagues has contributed to clarify the role played by interferon in the treatment of some forms of human cancer, and has provided knowledge on the link between p53 and IFN-alpha/-beta. The p53 response not only contributes to tumor suppression but is also important in eliciting an apoptotic response to viral infection and consequent damage to the cell's reproductive cycle.

Cancer and defective apoptotic pathways

Liling Yang et al. reported in the 15 February 2003, issue of Cancer Research [18] the results of their work in the role played by a defective death signal in a type of lung cancer cells called NCI-H460 (human non-small cell lung cancer cells). They found that the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is overexpressed in H460 cells. XIAPs bind to the processed form of caspase-9, and suppress the activity of apoptotic activator cytochrome c (see previous section on biochemical execution).

The apoptotic pathway was found to be dramatically restored in H460 cells with a Smac peptide (SmacN7) that targets IAPs. Yang and her team successfully developed a SmacN7 peptide that selectively reversed apoptosis resistance - and hence tumor growth - in H460 cells in mice.

(See also the role of Gefitinib and peptidomimetics in restoring apoptotic pathways.)

Role of apoptotic products in tumor immunity

An interesting case of re-use and feed-back of apoptotic products was presented by Matthew L. Albert in a research article that won him an Amersham Biosciences & Science Prize for Young Scientists in Molecular Biology, and published in Science Online in December, 2001. Albert described how dendritic Cells, a type of antigen-presenting cells, phagocytose (that is, engulf) apoptotic tumor cells. Upon maturation, these dendritic cells present antigen (derived from the apoptotic corpses) to killer T cells, which are then primed for the eradication of cells undergoing malignant transformation. This apoptosis-dependent pathway for T cell activation is not present during necrosis, and has opened exciting possibilities in tumor immunity research.

Laboratory assays for apoptosis

The gold standard for detecting apoptosis in progress is still direct inspection for pyknotic bodies under light microscope or electron microscope. Other assays include:

  • TUNEL assay, in which broken DNA ends are labeled preferentially. Note, however, that this will also detect less-orderly cell death such as necrosis.
  • Caspase assay, in which caspase cleavage of a marker protein allows detection.
  • Annexin A5 assay, in which cell surface exposure of phosphatidylserine is measured with fluorescently (e.g. FITC or phycoerythrin) linked, phosphatidylserine binding protein, annexin A5. Note, however, that necrotic cells also expose phosphatidylserine on the cell surface. Necrotic cells are discriminated from apoptotic cell by adding simultaneously the dna binding agent propidium iodide. Necrotic cells have a permeable membrane and apoptotic cells not. Thus cells that bind only annexin A5 are considered apoptotic while cells that bind both annexin A5 and propidium iodide are considered necrotic.
  • DNA laddering, in which certain characteristic bands are visualized in agarose gel electrophoresis.
  • Trypan Blue Exclusion Assay, in which a blue dye enters apoptotic cells, but is excluded from viable cells. The dye enters apoptotic cells because its membrane has become compromised.

History and highlights in apoptosis research

A timeline of apoptosis research can be found in Cell Death and Differentiation (2002) 9:349-54.[19]

Early research, and the "worm people" at Cambridge

Sydney Brenner's studies on animal development began in the late-1950s in what was to become the Laboratory of Molecular Biology (LMB) in Cambridge, UK. It was at this lab that during the 1970s and 1980s, a team led by John Sulston succeeded in tracing the nematode C. elegan's entire embryonic cell lineage. In other words, Sulston and his team had traced where each and every cell in the roundworm's embryo came from during the division process, and where it ended up.

H. Robert Horvitz arrived from the US at the LMB in 1974, where he collaborated with Sulston. Both would share the 2002 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with Brenner, and Horvitz would go back to the US in 1978 to establish his own lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Brenner's original interests were centered in genetics and in the development of the nervous system, but cell lineage and differentiation inevitably led to the study of cell fate: "One aspect of the cell lineage particularly caught my attention: in addition to the 959 cells generated during worm development and found in the adult, another 131 cells are generated but are not present in the adult. These cells are absent because they undergo programmed cell death," as Horvitz narrated in his Nobel Lecture "Worms, Life and Death," delivered on 8 December. 2002 [20].

Programmed cell death had been known long before "the worm people" began to publish their celebrated findings. In 1964 Richard A. Lockshin and Carroll Williams published their contribution on "Endocrine potentiation of the breakdown of the intersegmental muscles of silkmoths" in the Journal of insect physiology (10 p. 643), where they used the concept of "programmed cell death," during a time when not much research was being carried out on this topic. John W. Saunders, Jr., stated the following in his 1966 contribution titled "Death in Embryonic Systems": "abundant death, often cataclysmic in its onslaught, is part of early development in many animals; it is the usual method of eliminating organs and tissues that is useful only during embryonic or larval life..." [21]. A little further on, this author lamented that too little had been done to analyze the significance of this process. Saunders, it should be noted, recognized that he was building on earlier work by A. Glücksmann, and others.

Saunders and Lockshin reciprocally acknowledged that they benefitted from each other's work, and both pointed out the possibility that cell death might be regulated. Their observations helped to lead later work toward the genetic pathways of programmed cell death.

Coining of the term apoptosis

In a signal article published in 1972, John F. Kerr, Andrew H. Wyllie and A. R. Currie, coined the term "apoptosis" in order to differentiate naturally-occurring developmental cell death, from the necrosis that results from acute tissue injury [22]. They adopted the Greek word for the process of leaves falling from trees or petals falling from flowers (Gilbert 2003, p. 164).

They also noted that the structural changes characteristic of apoptosis (see the section on Morphology, above) were present in cells that died in order to maintain an equilibrium between cell proliferation and death in a particular tissue (see Homeostasis, above).


Landmark research by David L. Vaux and colleagues described the anti-apoptotic and tumorigenic (tumor-causing) role of the human cancer gene bcl-2 [23]. Researchers had been hot in the track of oncogenes (genes that played a prominent role in causing cancer), and now more and more of the pieces were falling into place. However, although bcl-2 was the first component of the cell death mechanism to be cloned in any organism, identification of other components of the vertebrate mechanism had to await the linking of apoptosis (in vertebrate systems) with the mechanism for programmed cell death in the worm.

1990s and later

In 1991, Ron Ellis, Junying Yuan and Horvitz released a rounded and up-to-date account of research on programmed cell death in their "Mechanisms and Functions of Cell Death" [24]. Among other important work at Horvitz's laboratory, graduate students Hilary Ellis and Chand Desai had made the first discovery of genes that encode apoptosis-inducing proteins: ced-3 and ced-4.

Ron Ellis also identified a gene with an opposite effect: ced-9. The product of this gene, CED-9, protects cells from programmed cell death, so its expression (or lack of) conveys a life-or-death decision on individual cells. In December 1992, David Vaux and Stuart Kim showed that human Bcl-2 could inhibit programmed cell death in the worm, thus linking PCD and apoptosis, revealing them to be the same, evolutionarily conserved process[25].

In 1994, Michael Hengartner published a paper showing that ced-9 had similar sequence to bcl-2 (which is not, actually, a single gene but a whole family of mammalian genes).

Horvitz would recount in his Nobel Lecture: "I believe that the fact that Bcl-2 proved to look like a worm protein that antagonized programmed cell death helped convince researchers that the function of Bcl-2 was to antagonize the cell death process. I also believe that this similarity made the worm cell-death pathway suddenly a topic of major interest in the biomedical community, as this pathway was no longer simply an abstract formalism derived from complicated genetic studies of a microscopic soil-dwelling roundworm but rather a framework for a process fundamental to human biology and human disease."

In 1992, two independent teams working at pharmaceutical companies had identified and purified interleukin-1-beta-converting enzyme (ICE) in human cells, and succeeded in cloning the DNA sequence of this cysteine protease [26], [27]. The following year, graduate students Shai Shaham and Junying Yuan working in Horvitz's laboratory identified ICE as the mammalian counterpart of CED-3 (that is, the product of the ced-3 gene in C. elegans).[28]

In 1997, a protein similar to CED-4 was identified, in the laboratory of Xiaodong Wang (Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas), which they called Apaf-1 (apoptotic protease activating factor). The team published their results in an article entitled "Apaf-1, a human protein homologous to C. elegans CED-4, participates in cytochrome c-dependent activation of caspase-3" [29].

Wang and his team identified and reconstituted the mitochondrial pathway to apoptosis (see Biochemical execution, above). Their published results illuminated whole new avenues of research on inflammatory diseases, cancer, and apoptosis, in general.

By 1998, research on the topic had already increased, as attested in the editorial "Cell Death in Us and Others," written by an important contributor to apoptosis research, Pierre Golstein, in the 28 August. 1998 issue of Science: "Although there have been scattered reports on the topic of cell death for more than a century, the 20,000 publications on this topic within the past 5 years reflect a shift from historically-mild interest to contemporary fascination." [30]

Kerr, Wyllie, and Currie (see Coining of the term apoptosis, above) meant, among other features, to remark on the de-adhesiveness of apoptotic cells from their natural surroundings, following programmed cell death. Anoikis (homeless in Greek) is chronologically an inverse process: de-adhesiveness of viable cells from their surroundings inducing programmed cell death. Integrins are essential adhesive molecules in this process, but additional factors probably play a role. Beyond the physiological importance, understanding these patterns will be relevant to maintaining the vitality of cells used for cell therapy. Abnormal apoptosis and clearance of apoptotic cells is a fundamental factor in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases including cancer, neuro-degenerative and ischemic diseases, AIDS, and autoimmunity. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the antigen responsible for most anti-DNA antibodies, exclusively generated in this disease, are derived from nucleosomes. As nucleosomes are mainly generated during programmed cell death, excess of apoptotic material and altered clearance may induce autoreactive immune responses. On the other side of the spectrum, failure to die, as exemplified in MRL/1pr mice and human lymphoproliferative disorder, may allow persistence of autoreactive cells and prevent the resolution of inflammation. When combined, we may conclude that dying properly is essential for living properly.

See also

  • Autolysis
  • Caspase
  • Bcl-2
  • Perforin
  • Granzymes
  • Immunology

Further reading

  • Lawen, A. (2003). Apoptosis – an introduction. BioEssays 25, 888-896.[31][32]


  • Albert, M.L., Science Online, 21 December 2001 (ScienceOnline).
  • Alberts, Bruce, Dennis Bray, Julian Lewis, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts & James D. Watson (1994). Molecular biology of the cell, 3rd edition. Garland Publishing, Inc (EntrezBookshelf).
  • Bast, Robert C. Jr., et al. (eds) (2000). Cancer Medicine, 5th Edition. B.C. Decker Inc (EntrezBookshelf).
  • Cerretti, D.P. et al., Science 256 p. 97, 3 April 1992 (PMID 1373520).
  • Chiarugi, A. and Moskowitz M.A., Science 297 p. 200, 12 July 2002 (PMID 12114611).
  • Chen, G. and Goeddel, D.V., Science 296 p. 1634, 31 May 2002 (PMID 12040173).
  • Cheng, E.H. et al., Science 301 p. 513, 25 July 2003 (PMID 12881569).
  • Damasio, Antonio (1999). The Feeling of What Happens, Harcourt Brace & Co., New York.
  • Ellis, Ron et al., Annual Review of Cell Biology 7 p. 663-698, Nov 1991 (PMID 1809356).
  • Fesik, S.W. and Shi, Y., Science 294 p. 1477, 16 November 2001 (PMID 11711663).
  • Gilbert, S. F.: Developmental Biology, 7th ed., Sinauer Associates, Stamford, Ct., 2003 (6th ed. available at EntrezBookshelf).
  • Goeddel, D.V. et al.(as authorities): Connection Map for Tumor Necrosis Factor Pathway, Science STKE ([33]).
  • Golstein, P.: Science 281 p. 1283, 28 August 1998 (PMID 9735040).
  • Guerrero and Ruiz, Science 301 p. 774, 8 August 2003 (PMID 12907783).
  • Hanayama, R. et al., Nature 417 p. 182, 9 May 2002 (PMID 12000961).
  • Hanayama, R. et al., Science 304 p. 1147, 21 May 2004 (PMID 15155946).
  • Horvitz, H.R., 2002 Nobel Lecture (
  • Kerr, John F., Andrew H. Wyllie and A. R. Currie: "Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics", British Journal of Cancer 26, pgs. 239–57, 1972 (PMID 4561027).
  • Kihlmark, M.; Imreh, G.; Hallberg, E.; Journal of Cell Science 114 p. 3643, 2001 (PMID 11707516).
  • Li, M.O. et al., Science 302 p. 1560, 28 November 2003 (PMID 14645847).
  • Murphy, K.M. et al., Cell Death and Differentiation 7 p. 112, Jan. 2000 (PMID 10713725).
  • Nagata, S., Experimental cell research 256 p. 12, 10 April 2000 (PMID 10739646).
  • Saunders, J.W., Science 154 p. 604, 4 November 1966 (PMID 5332319, JSTOR).
  • Savill, J. et al., Science 302 p. 1516, 28 November 2003 (PMID 14645835).
  • Susin, S.A. et al., Journal of Experimental Medicine 192 p. 571, 21 August 2000 (PMID 10952727).
  • Takaoka, Akinori, et al., Nature 424 p. 517, 31 July 2003 (PMID 12872134).
  • Thayer et al., Nature 425, pgs. 851-856, 23 October 2003 (PMID 14520413).
  • Thibert et al., Science 301 p. 843, 8 August 2003 (PMID 12907805).
  • Thompson, C.B., Science 267 p. 1456, 10 March 1995 (PMID 7878464).
  • Thornberry, Nancy A. et al., Nature 356 p. 768, 30 April 1992 (PMID 1574116).
  • Vaux et al., Nature 335 p. 440, 29 September 1988 (PMID 3262202).
  • Wang, X. et al., Science 302 p. 1563, 28 November 2003 (PMID 14645848).
  • Wajant, H., Science 296 p. 1635, 31 May 2002 (PMID 12040174).
  • Wajant, H. (as authority): Connection Map for Fas Signaling Pathway, Science STKE ([34]).
  • Werlen et al., Science 299 p. 1859, 21 March 2003 (PMID 12649474).
  • Yu et al., Science 297 p. 259, 12 July 2002 (PMID 12114629).
  • Zou et al., Cell 90(3) p. 405, 8 August 1997 (PMID 9267021).

External links

cs:Apoptóza da:Apoptosis de:Apoptose es:Apoptosis fr:Apoptose io:Apoptozo id:Apoptosis he:אפופטוזה lt:Apoptozė hu:Apoptózis nl:Apoptose no:Apoptose pt:Apoptose ru:Апоптоз sk:Apoptóza sl:Apoptoza sr:Апоптоза su:Apoptosis fi:Apoptoosi sv:Apoptos zh:细胞凋亡

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).