Psychology Wiki

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Animals · Animal ethology · Comparative psychology · Animal models · Outline · Index

Fossil range: Template:FossilrangeLate Ordovician (but see text) - recent
Horseshoe crab underside
Horseshoe crab underside
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Heymons, 1901

The subphylum (or phylum[1]) Chelicerata constitutes one of the major subdivisions of the phylum (or superphylum[1]) Arthropoda, and includes horseshoe crabs, scorpions, spiders and mites. They originated as marine animals, possibly in the Cambrian period, but the first confirmed chelicerate fossils, eurypterids, date from 445 million years ago in the Late Ordovician period. The surviving marine species are the four Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs), and possibly the 1,300 species of Pycnogonida (sea spiders) if these are chelicerates. On the other there are over 77,000 well-identified species of air-breathing chelicerates, and there may be about 500,000 unidentified species.

Like all arthropods, chelicerates have segmented bodies with jointed limbs, all covered in a cuticle made of chitin and proteins. The chelicerate bauplan consists of two tagmata, the cephalothorax and abdomen, except that mites have no visible division between these sections. The chelicerae that give the group its name are the only appendages that appear before the mouth, and in most sub-groups are modest pincers used in feeding; however spiders' chelicerae form fangs that most species use to inject venom into their prey. The group has the typical arthropod open circulatory system, in which a tube-like heart pumps blood through the hemocoel, which is the major body cavity. Marine chelicerates have gills while the air-breathing forms generally have both book lungs and tracheae. In general the ganglia of living chelicerates' central nervous systems fuse into large masses in the cephalothorax, but there are wide variations and this fusion is very limited in the Mesothelae, which are regarded as the oldest and most primitive group of spiders. Most chelicerates rely on modified bristles for information about chemical changes and about touch, vibrations and air currents. However the most active hunting spiders have very acute eyesight.

Chelicerates were originally predators but the group has diversified to use all the major feeding strategies: predation, parasitism, herbivory, scavenging and eating decaying organic matter. Although harvestmen can digest solid food, the guts of most modern chelicerates are too narrow for this and they generally liquidize their food by grinding it with their chelicerae and pedipalps and flooding it with digestive enzymes. To conserve water, air-breathing chelicerates excrete waste as solids that are removed from their blood by Malpighian tubules, structures which also evolved independently in insects. While the marine horseshoe crabs rely on external fertilization, air-breathing chelicerates use internal but usually indirect fertilization. Predatory species generally use elaborate courtship rituals to prevent males from being eaten before they can mate. Most lay eggs that hatch as what look like miniature adults, but all scorpions and a few species of mites keep the eggs inside their bodies until the young emerge. In most chelicerate species the young have to fend for themselves, but in scorpions and some species of spider the females protect and feed their young.

The evolutionary origins of chelicerates from the early arthropods have been debated for decades. Although there is considerable agreement about the relationships between most chelicerate sub-groups, the inclusion of the Pycnogonida in this taxon has recently been doubted (see below), and the position of scorpions is still controversial, though they were long considered the most primitive (basal) of the arachnids[1].

Although the venom of a few spider and scorpion species can be very dangerous to humans, medical researchers are investigating the use of these venoms for the treatment of disorders ranging from cancer to erectile dysfunction. The medical industry also uses the blood of horseshoe crabs as a test for the presence of dangerous bacteria. Genetic engineers have experimented with modifying goats' milk and plants' leaves to produce spider silk. Mites can cause allergies in humans, transmit several diseases to humans and their livestock, and are serious agricultural pests.


Template:Annotated image/Arthropod head problem

Segmentation and cuticle

The Chelicerata are arthropods as they have: segmented bodies with jointed limbs, all covered in a cuticle made of chitin and proteins; heads that are composed of several segments that fuse during the development of the embryo; a much reduced coelom; a hemocoel through which the blood circulates, driven by a tube-like heart.[2] Chelicerates' bodies consist of two tagmata, sets of segments that serve similar functions: the foremost one, called the cephalothorax or prosoma, is a complete fusion of the segments that in an insect would form two separate tagmata, the head and thorax; the rear tagma is called the abdomen or opisthosoma.[3] However in the Acari (mites and ticks) there is no visible division between these sections.[4]

The cephalothorax is formed in the embryo by fusion of the acron , which carries the eyes, with segments two to seven, which all have paired appendages, while segment one is lost during the embryo's development. Segment two has a pair of chelicerae, small appendages that often form pincers, segment three has a pair of pedipalps that in most sub-groups perform sensory functions, while the remaining four cephalothorax segments have pairs of legs. In primitive forms the acron has a pair of compound eyes on the sides and four pigment-cup ocelli ("little eyes") in the middle.[3] The mouth is between segments two and three.[5]

The abdomen consists of twelve or fewer segments which originally formed two groups, a "preabdomen" or "mesoma" of seven segments and a "postabdomen" or "metasoma" of five, terminating with a telson or spike. The abdominal appendages of modern chelicerates are missing or heavily modified[3] – for example in spiders the remaining appendages form spinnerets that extrude silk,[6] while those of horseshoe crabs (Xiphosura) form gills.[7]

Like all arthropods, chelicerates' bodies and appendages are covered with a tough cuticle made mainly of chitin and proteins which are chemically hardened. Since this cannot stretch, the animals have to molt in order to grow, in other words they grow new but still soft cuticles and then cast off the old one and wait for the new one to harden. Until the new cuticle has hardened the animals are defenseless and almost immobilized.[8]

File:Eurypterid chelicera.png

The chelicera of a eurypterid.

File:Spider chelicera & fang.gif

Spider's chelicera, showing the fang almost completely folded away.

Chelicerae and pedipalps

These appendages vary widely in form and function and the only consistent difference between them is their position: chelicerae arise from segment two, ahead of the mouth, and pedipalps from segment three, behind the mouth.[3]

The chelicerae ("claw horns") that give the sub-phylum its name normally consist of three sections, and the claw is formed by the third section and a rigid extension of the second.[3][9] However spiders' have only two sections, and the second forms a fang that folds away behind the first when not in use.[6] The relative sizes of chelicerae vary widely: those of some eurypterids formed large claws that extended ahead of the body,[9] while scorpions' are tiny pincers that are used in feeding and project only slightly in front of the head.[10]

In most chelicerates the pedipalps are relatively small and are used as sensors.[3] However those of male spiders have bulbous tips that act to syringes to inject sperm into the females' reproductive openings when mating,[6] while scorpions' form large claws used for capturing prey.[10]

Body cavities and circulatory systems

Template:Annotated image/Spider main organs As in all arthropods, the chelicerate body has a very small coelom restricted to small areas round the reproductive and excretory systems. The main body cavity is a hemocoel that runs most of the length of the body and through which blood flows, driven by a tubular heart that collects blood from the rear and pumps it forward. Although arteries direct the blood to specific parts of the body, they have open ends rather than joining directly to veins, and chelicerates therefore have open circulatory systems as is typical for arthropods.[11]

Respiratory systems

These depend on individual sub-groups' environments. Modern terrestrial chelicerates generally have both book lungs, which deliver oxygen and remove waste gases via the blood, and tracheae, which do the same without using the blood as a transport system.[12] The living horseshoe crabs are aquatic and have book gills that lie in a horizontal plane. For a long time it was assumed that the extinct eurypterids had gills, but the fossil evidence was ambiguous. However a fossil of the Template:Convert/mmTemplate:Convert/test/A long eurypterid Onychopterella, from the Late Ordovician period, has what appear to be three pairs of vertically-oriented book gills whose internal structure is very similar to that of scorpions' book lungs.[13]

Feeding and digestion

The guts of most modern chelicerates are too narrow to take solid food.[12] All scorpions and almost all spiders are predators that "pre-process" food in preoral cavities formed by the chelicerae and the bases of the pedipalps.[6][10] However one predominantly vegetarian spider species is known,[14] and many supplement their diets with nectar and pollen.[15] Many of the Acari (ticks and mites) are blood-sucking parasites, but there are many predatory, vegetarian and scavenger sub-groups. All the Acari have a retractable feeding assembly that consists of the chelicerae, pedipalps and parts of the exoskeleton, and which forms a preoral cavity for pre-processing food.[4]

Harvestmen are among the minority of living chelicerates that can take solid food, and the group includes predators, vegetarians and scavengers.[16] Horseshoe crabs are also capable of processing solid food, and use a distinctive feeding system. Claws at the tips of their legs grab small invertebrates and pass them to a food groove that runs from between the rearmost legs to the mouth, which is on the underside of the head and faces slightly backwards. The bases of the legs form toothed gnathobases that both grind the food and push it towards the mouth.[7] This is how the earliest arthropods are thought to have fed.[17]


Horseshoe crabs convert nitrogenous wastes to ammonia and dump it via their gills, and excrete other wastes as feces via the anus. They also have nephridia ("little kidneys"), which extract other wastes for excretion as urine.[7] Ammonia is so toxic that it must be diluted rapidly with large quantities of water.[18] Most terrestrial chelicerates cannot afford to use so much water and therefore convert nitrogenous wastes to other chemicals which can be excreted as dry matter. Extraction is done by various combinations of nephridia and Malpighian tubules. The tubules filter wastes out of the blood and dump them into the hindgut as solids, a system that has evolved independently in insects and several groups of arachnids.[12]

Nervous system

  Cephalothorax ganglia fused into brain Abdominal ganglia fused into brain
Horseshoe crabs All First two segments only
Scorpions All None
Mesothelae First two pairs only None
Other arachnids All All

Chelicerate nervous systems are based on the standard arthropod model of a pair of nerve cords, each with a ganglion per segment, and a brain formed by fusion of the ganglia just behind the mouth with those ahead of it.[19] However since chelicerates lose the first segment, which bears antennae in other arthropods, chelicerate brains include only one pair of pre-oral ganglia instead of two.[3] There is a notable but variable trend towards fusion of other ganglia into the brain. The brains of horseshoe crabs include all the ganglia of the cephalothorax plus those of the first two abdominal segments, while the other abdominal segments retain separate pairs of ganglia.[7] In most living arachnids, except scorpions if they are true arachnids, all the ganglia, including those which would normally be in the abdomen, are fused into a single mass in the cephalothorax and there are no ganglia in the abdomen.[12] However in the Mesothelae, which are regarded as the most primitive living spiders, the ganglia of the abdomen and the rear part of the cephalothorax remain unfused,[20] and in scorpions the ganglia of the cephalothorax are fused but the abdomen retains separate pairs of ganglia.[12]


As with other arthropods, chelicerates' cuticles would block out information about the outside world, except that they are penetrated by many sensors or connections from sensors to the nervous system. In fact spiders and other arthropods have modified their cuticles into elaborate arrays of sensors. Various touch and vibration sensors, mostly bristles called setae, respond to different levels of force, from strong contact to very weak air currents. Chemical sensors provide equivalents of taste and smell, often by means of setae.[21]

Living chelicerates have both compound eyes, mounted on the sides of the head, and pigment-cup ocelli ("little eyes"), mounted in the middle. The eyes of horseshoe crabs can detect movement but not form images.[7] At the other extreme, jumping spiders have a very wide field of vision,[6] and their main eyes are ten times as acute as those of dragonflies.[22]



Female scorpion Compsobuthus werneri carrying its young (white)

Horseshoe crabs, which are aquatic, use external fertilization, in other words the sperm and ova meet outside the parents' bodies. Their trilobite-like larvae look rather like miniature adults as they have full sets of appendages and eyes, but initially they have only two pairs of book-gills and gain three more pairs as they molt.[7]

Being air-breathing animals, the living arachnids use internal fertilization, which is direct in some species, in other words the males' genitalia make contact with the females'. However in most species fertilization is indirect. Male spiders use their pedipalps as syringes to "inject" sperm into the females' reproductive openings,[6] but most arachnids produce spermatophores (packages of sperm) which the females take into their bodies.[12] Courtship rituals are common, especially in the most powerful predators, where males risk being eaten before mating. Most arachnids lay eggs, but all scorpions and a few mites keep the eggs inside their bodies until they hatch and offspring rather like miniature adults emerge.[12]

Levels of parental care for the young range from zero to prolonged. Scorpions carry their young on their backs until the first molt, and in a few semi-social species the young remain with their mother.[23] Some spiders care for their young, for example a wolf spider's brood cling to rough bristles on the mother's back,[6] and females of some species respond to the "begging" behavior of their young by giving them their prey, provided it is no longer struggling, or even regurgitate food.[24]

Evolutionary history

Fossil record

There are large gaps in the chelicerates' fossil record because, like all arthropods, their exoskeletons are organic and hence their fossils are rare except in a few lagerstätten where conditions were exceptionally suited to preserving fairly soft tissues. The Burgess shale animals Sanctacaris and Sidneyia from about 505 million years ago

have been classified as chelicerates, the former because of its pattern of tagmosis (how the segments are grouped, especially in the head) and the latter because its appendages resemble those of the Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs). However cladistic analyses that consider wider ranges of characteristics place neither as chelicerates. There is debate about whether Fuxianhuia from earlier in the Cambrian period, about 525 million years ago

, was a chelicerate. Another Cambrian fossil, Kodymirus, was originally classified as an aglaspid but may have been a eurypterid and therefore a chelicerate. If any of these was closely related to chelicerates, there is a gap of at least 43 million years in the record between true chelicerates and their nearest not-quite chelicerate relatives.[25]

File:Palaeotarbus jerami.png

Palaeotarbus jerami, a trigonotarbid and the oldest known arachnid

Until recently the earliest known xiphosuran fossil dated from the Late Llandovery stage of the Silurian 436 428 ,[26] but in 2008 an older specimen was reported from about 445 million years ago

in the Late Ordovician.[27] Eurypterids have left few good fossils and the earliest confirmed eurypterids appear in the Late Ordovician period a little over 445 million years ago


The oldest known arachnid is the trigonotarbid Palaeotarbus jerami, from about 420 million years ago

in the Silurian period, and had a triangular cephalothorax and segmented abdomen, as well as eight legs and a pair of pedipalps.[29] 

Attercopus fimbriunguis, from 386 million years ago

in the Devonian period, bears the earliest known silk-producing spigots, and was therefore hailed as a spider,[30] but it lacked spinnerets and hence was not a true spider.[31] Several Carboniferous spiders were members of the Mesothelae, a primitive group now represented only by the Liphistiidae.[30]

The Late Silurian Proscorpius has been classified as a scorpion, but differed significantly from modern scorpions: it appears wholly aquatic since it had gills rather than book lungs or tracheae; its mouth was completely under its head and almost between the first pair of legs, as in the extinct eurypterids and living horseshoe crabs.[32] Fossils of terrestrial scorpions with book lungs have been found in Early Devonian rocks form about 402 million years ago .[33]

Relationships with other arthropods







A recent view of chelicerate phylogeny[34]








A "traditional" view of chelicerate phylogeny[34]

The "traditional" view of the arthropod "family tree" shows chelicerates as less closely related to the other major living groups (crustaceans; hexapods, which includes insects; and myriapods, which includes centipedes and millipedes) than these other groups are to each other. Recent research since 2001, using both molecular phylogenetics (the application of cladistic analysis to biochemistry, especially to organisms' DNA and RNA) and detailed examination of how various arthropds' nervous systems develop in the embryos, suggests that chelicerates are most closely related to myriapods, while hexapods and crustaceans are each other's closest relatives. However these results are derived from analyzing only living arthropods, and including extinct ones such as trilobites causes a swing back to the "traditional" view, placing trilobites as the sister-group of the Tracheata (hexapods plus myriapods) and chelicerates as least closely related to the other groups.[34]

Major sub-groups

Template:Annotated image/Arachnid phylogeny Shultz 2007 It is generally agreed that the Chelicerata contain the orders Arachnida (spiders, scorpions, mites, etc.), Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs) and Eurypterida (sea scorpions, extinct).[35] The extinct Chasmataspida may be a sub-group within Eurypterida.[35][36] The Pycnogonida (sea spiders) were traditionally classified as chelicerates, but some features suggest they may be representatives of the earliest arthropods from which the well-known groups such as chelicerates evolved.[37]

However the structure of "family tree" relationships within the Chelicerata has been controversial ever since the late 19th century. An attempt in 2002 to combine analysis of RNA features of modern chelicerates and anatomical features of modern and fossil ones produced credible results for many lower-level groups, but its results for the high-level relationships between major sub-groups of chelicerates were unstable, in other words minor changes in the inputs caused significant changes in the outputs of the computer program used (POY).[38] An analysis in 2007 using only anatomical features produced the cladogram on the right, but also noted that many uncertainties remain. [39]

The position of scorpions is particularly controversial. Some early fossils such as the Late Silurian Proscorpius have been classified by paleontologists as scorpions, but described as wholly aquatic as they had gills rather than book lungs or tracheae. Their mouths are also completely under their heads and almost between the first pair of legs, as in the extinct eurypterids and living horseshoe crabs.[32] This presents a difficult choice: classify Proscorpius and other aquatic fossils as something other than scorpions, despite the similarities; accept that "scorpions" are not monophyletic but consist of separate aquatic and terrestrial groups;[32] or treat scorpions as more closely related to eurypterids and possibly horseshoe crabs than to spiders and other arachnids,[13] so that either scorpions are not arachnids or "arachnids" are not monophyletic.[32]


Although well behind the insects, chelicerates are one of the most diverse groups of animals, with over 77,000 living species that have been described in scientific publications.[40] Some estimates suggest that there may be 130,000 undescribed species of spider and nearly 500,000 undescribed species of mites and ticks.[41] While the earliest chelicerates and the living Pycnogonida (if they are chelicerates[37]) and Xiphosura are marine animals that breathe dissolved oxygen, the vast majority of living species are air-breathers,[40] although a few spider species build "diving bell" webs that enable them to live under water.[42] Like their ancestors, most living chelicerates are carnivores, mainly on small invertebrates. However many species feed as parasites, vegetarians, scavengers and detritivores.[4][16][40]

Diversity of living chelicerates
Group Described species[40] Diet
Pycnogonida (sea-spiders) 500 Carnivorous[40]
Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs) 4 Carnivorous[40]
Araneae (spiders) 34,000 Carnivorous;[40] 1 vegetarian[14]
Acari (mites and ticks) 32,000 Carnivorous, parasitic, vegetarian, detritivore[4][40]
Opiliones (harvestmen) 5,000 Carnivorous, vegetarian, detritivore[16]
Pseudoscorpiones (false scorpions) 3,200 Carnivorous[43]
Scorpiones (scorpions) 1,400 Carnivorous[10]
Solifugae (sunspiders) 900 Carnivorous, omnivorous[44]
Schizomida (small whipscorpions) 180  
Amblypygi (whipspiders) 100  
Uropygi (Thelyphonida – whipscorpions) 90 Carnivorous[45]
Palpigradi (micro whipscorpions) 60  
Ricinulei 60  

Interaction with humans

File:Yellow mite (Tydeidae) Lorryia formosa 2 edit.jpg

A microscopic mite Lorryia formosa.

In the past, Native Americans ate the flesh of horseshoe crabs, and used the tail spines as spear tips and the shells to bail water out of their canoes. More recent attempts to use horseshoe crabs as food for livestock were abandoned when it was found that this gave the meat a bad taste. The blood of horseshoe crabs contains a clotting agent Limulus Amebocyte Lysate which is now used to test that antibiotics and kidney machines are free of dangerous bacteria, and to detect spinal meningitis and some cancers.[46]

Cooked tarantula spiders are considered a delicacy in Cambodia,[47] and by the Piaroa Indians of southern Venezuela.[48] Spider venoms may be a less polluting alternative to conventional pesticides as they are deadly to insects but the great majority are harmless to vertebrates.[49] Possible medical uses for spider venoms are being investigated, for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia,[50] Alzheimer's disease,[51] strokes,[52] and erectile dysfunction.[53] Because spider silk is both light and very strong, attempts are being made to produce it in goats' milk and in the leaves of plants, by means of genetic engineering.[54] [55] There were about 100 reliably reported deaths from spider bites in the 20th century,[56] compared with 1,500 from jellyfish stings.[57]

Scorpion stings are thought to be a significant danger in less-developed countries, for example they cause about 1,000 deaths per year in Mexico but only one every few years in the USA. Most of these incidents are caused by accidental human "invasions" of scorpion's nests.[58] However medical uses of scorpion venom are being investigated for treatment of brain cancers and bone diseases.[59][60]

Ticks are parasitic, and some transmit micro-organisms and parasites that can cause diseases in humans, while the saliva of a few species can directly cause tick paralysis if they are not removed within a day or two.[61] A few of the closely-related mites also infest humans, some causing intense itching by their bites and others by burrowing into the skin. Species that normally infest other animals such as rodents may infest humans if their normal hosts are eliminated.[62] Three species of mite are a threat to honey bees and one of these, Varroa destructor, has become the largest single problem faced by beekeepers worldwide.[63] Mites cause several forms of allergic diseases, including hay fever, asthma and eczema, and they aggravate atopic dermatitis.[64] Mites are also significant crop pests, although predatory mites may be useful in controlling some of these.[40][65]


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Margulis, Lynn; Schwartz, Karlene (1998), Five Kingdoms, An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth (third ed.), W.H. Freeman and Company, ISBN 0716730278 
  2. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 518–522, ISBN 0030259827 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 554–555, ISBN 0030259827 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 591–595, ISBN 0030259827 
  5. Willmer, P., and Willmer, P.G. (1990), Invertebrate Relationships: Patterns in Animal Evolution, Cambridge University Press, p. 275, ISBN 0521337127,, retrieved on 2008-10-14 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 571–584, ISBN 0030259827 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 555–559, ISBN 0030259827 
  8. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 521–525, ISBN 0030259827 
  9. 9.0 9.1 Braddy, S.J., Markus Poschmann, M., and Tetlie, O.E. (2008), "Giant claw reveals the largest ever arthropod", Biology Letters 4: 106–109, doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0491 
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 565–569, ISBN 0030259827 
  11. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 527–528, ISBN 0030259827 
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 559–564, ISBN 0030259827 
  13. 13.0 13.1 Braddy, S.J., Aldridge, R.J., Gabbott, S.E., and Theron, J.N. (1999), "Lamellate book-gills in a late Ordovician eurypterid from the Soom Shale, South Africa: support for a eurypterid-scorpion clade", Lethaia 32 (1): 72–74, doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1999.tb00582.x (inactive 2009-04-11) 
  14. 14.0 14.1 Meehan, C,J. Olson, E.J. and Curry, R.L. (21 August 2008), Exploitation of the Pseudomyrmex–Acacia mutualism by a predominantly vegetarian jumping spider (Bagheera kiplingi),, retrieved on 2008-10-10 
  15. Jackson, R.R. et al. (2001), "Jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) that feed on nectar" (PDF), J. Zool. Lond. 255: 25–29, doi:10.1017/S095283690100108X, 
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 588–590, ISBN 0030259827 
  17. Gould, S.J. (1990), Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History, Hutchinson Radius, p. 105, ISBN 0091742714 
  18. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 529–530, ISBN 0030259827 
  19. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 531–532, ISBN 0030259827 
  20. Coddington, J.A. & Levi, H.W. (1991), "Systematics and Evolution of Spiders (Araneae)", Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 565–592, doi:10.1146/ 
  21. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 532–537, ISBN 0030259827 
  22. Harland, D.P., and Jackson, R.R. (2000), "PDF “Eight-legged cats” and how they see - a review of recent research on jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae)", Cimbebasia 16: 231–240, PDF, retrieved on 2008-10-11 
  23. Lourenço, W.R. (2002), "Reproduction in scorpions, with special reference to parthenogenesis", in Toft, S., and Scharff, N. (PDF), European Arachnology 2000, Aarhus University Press, pp. 71–85, ISBN 87 7934 001 6,, retrieved on 2008-09-28 
  24. Foelix, R.F. (1996), "Reproduction", Biology of Spiders, Oxford University Press US, pp. 176–212, ISBN 0195095944,,M1, retrieved on 2008-10-08 
  25. Wills, M.A. (2001), "How good is the fossil record of arthropods? An assessment using the stratigraphic congruence of cladograms", Geological Journal 36 (3-4): 187–210, doi:10.1002/gj.882 
  26. Moore, R.A., Briggs, D.E.G., Braddy, S.J., Anderson, L.I., Mikulic, D.G., and Kluessendorf, J. (March 2005), "A new synziphosurine (Chelicerata, Xiphosura) from the late Llandovery (Silurian) Waukesha Lagerstaette, Wisconsin, USA", Journal of Paleontology 79 (2): 242–250, doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2005)079<0242:ANSCXF>2.0.CO;2 
  27. Rudkin, D.M., Young, G.A., and Nowlan, G.S. (January 2008), "The Oldest Horseshoe Crab: a New Xiphosurid from Late Ordovician Konservat-Lagerstätten Deposits, Manitoba, Canada", Palaeontology 51 (1): 1–9, doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00746.x (inactive 2009-04-11) 
  28. Stott, C.A., Tetlie, O.E., Braddy, S.J., Nowlan, G.S, Glasser, P.M.,and Devereux, M.G. (November 2005), "A New Eurypterid (Chelicerata) from the Upper Ordovician of Manitoulin Island, Ontario, Canada", Journal of Paleontology 79 (6): 1166–1174, doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2005)079[1166:ANECFT]2.0.CO;2 
  29. Dunlop, J.A. (September 1996), "A trigonotarbid arachnid from the Upper Silurian of Shropshire" (PDF), Palaeontology 39 (3): 605–614,, retrieved on 2008-10-12  The fossil was originally named Eotarbus but was renamed when it was realized that a Carboniferous arachnid had already been named Eotarbus: Dunlop, J.A., "A replacement name for the trigonotarbid arachnid Eotarbus Dunlop", Palaeontology 42 (1): 191 
  30. 30.0 30.1 Vollrath, F., and Selden, P.A. (December 2007), "The Role of Behavior in the Evolution of Spiders, Silks, and Webs" (PDF), Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38: 819–846, doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110221, Archived from the original on 2008-12-09,, retrieved on 2008-10-12 
  31. Selden, P.A., and Shear, W.A. (July 2008), "Fossil evidence for the origin of spider spinnerets" (PDF), Nature Precedings,, retrieved on 2008-10-12 
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 Weygoldt, P. (February, 1998), "Evolution and systematics of the Chelicerata", Experimental and Applied Acarology 22 (2): 63–79, doi:10.1023/A:1006037525704 
  33. Shear, W.A., Gensel, P.G. and Jeram, A.J. (December 1996), "Fossils of large terrestrial arthropods from the Lower Devonian of Canada", Nature 384: 555–557, doi:10.1038/384555a0 
  34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 Jenner, R.A. (2006), "Challenging received wisdoms: Some contributions of the new microscopy to the new animal phylogeny", Integrative and Comparative Biology 46 (2): 93–103, doi:10.1093/icb/icj014 
  35. 35.0 35.1 Schultz, J.W. (2007), "A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters", Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 150: 221–265, doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00284.x 
  36. O. Tetlie, E., and Braddy, S.J. (2003), "The first Silurian chasmataspid, Loganamaraspis dunlopi gen. et sp. nov. (Chelicerata: Chasmataspidida) from Lesmahagow, Scotland, and its implications for eurypterid phylogeny", Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 94: 227–234, doi:10.1017/S0263593300000638 
  37. 37.0 37.1 Poschmann, M., and Dunlop, J.A. (2006), "A New Sea Spider (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) with a Flagelliform Telson from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, Germany", Palaeontology 49 (5): 983–989, doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00583.x 
  38. Gonzalo Giribet G., Edgecombe, G.D., Wheeler, W.C., and Babbitt, C. (2002), "Phylogeny and Systematic Position of Opiliones: A Combined Analysis of Chelicerate Relationships Using Morphological and Molecular Data", Cladistics 18: 5–70, doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2002.tb00140.x 
  39. Shultz, J.W. (2007), "A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters", Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 150: 221–265, doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00284.x 
  40. 40.0 40.1 40.2 40.3 40.4 40.5 40.6 40.7 40.8 Shultz, J.W. (2001), "Chelicerata (Arachnids, Including Spiders, Mites and Scorpions)", Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001605 
  41. (PDF)Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Government, September 2005,, retrieved on 2008-10-26 
  42. Schütz, D., and Taborsky, M. (2003), "Adaptations to an aquatic life may be responsible for the reversed sexual size dimorphism in the water spider, Argyroneta aquatica" (PDF), Evolutionary Ecology Research 5 (1): 105–117,, retrieved on 2008-10-11 
  43. Pseudoscorpion - Penn State Entomology Department Fact Sheet, Pennsylvania State University,, retrieved on 2008-10-26 
  44. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004), Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.), Brooks / Cole, pp. 586–588, ISBN 0030259827 
  45. Harvey, M.S. (2002), "The Neglected Cousins: What do we Know about the Smaller Arachnid Orders?" (PDF), Journal of Arachnology 30: 357–372, doi:10.1636/0161-8202(2002)030[0357:TNCWDW]2.0.CO;2,, retrieved on 2008-10-26 
  46. Heard, W. (PDF), Coast, University of South Florida,, retrieved on 2008-08-25 
  47. Ray, N. (2002), Lonely Planet Cambodia, Lonely Planet Publications, p. 308, ISBN 1-74059-111-9 
  48. Weil, C. (2006), Fierce Food, Plume, ISBN 0452287006,, retrieved on 2008-10-03 
  49. Spider Venom Could Yield Eco-Friendly Insecticides, National Science Foundation (USA),, retrieved on 2008-10-11 
  50. Novak, K. (2001), "Spider venom helps hearts keep their rhythm", Nature Medicine 7 (155): 155, doi:10.1038/84588 
  51. Lewis, R.J., and Garcia, M.L. (October 2003), "Therapeutic potential of venom peptides" (PDF), Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2: 790–802, doi:10.1038/nrd1197,, retrieved on 2008-10-11 
  52. Bogin, O. (Spring 2005), "Venom Peptides and their Mimetics as Potential Drugs" (PDF), Modulator (19),, retrieved on 2008-10-11 
  53. Andrade, E., Villanova, F., Borra, P., et al. (2008), "Penile erection induced in vivo by a purified toxin from the Brazilian spider Phoneutria nigriventer", British Journal of Urology International 102 (7): 835–837, doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07762.x 
  54. Hinman, M.B., Jones J.A., and Lewis, R.W. (September 2000), "Synthetic spider silk: a modular fiber" (PDF), Trends in Biotechnology 18 (9): 374–379, doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(00)01481-5,, retrieved on 2008-10-19 
  55. Menassa, R., Zhu, H., Karatzas, C.N., Lazaris, A., Richman, A., and Brandle, J. (June 2004), "Spider dragline silk proteins in transgenic tobacco leaves: accumulation and field production", Plant Biotechnology Journal 2 (5): 431–438, doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00087.x 
  56. Diaz, J.H. (August 1, 2004), "The Global Epidemiology, Syndromic Classification, Management, and Prevention of Spider Bites", American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 71 (2): 239–250, PMID 15306718,, retrieved on 2008-10-11 
  57. Williamson, J.A., Fenner, P.J., Burnett, J.W., and Rifkin, J. (1996), Venomous and Poisonous Marine Animals: A Medical and Biological Handbook, UNSW Press, pp. 65–68, ISBN 0868402796,,M1, retrieved on 2008-10-03 
  58. Cheng, D., Dattaro, J.A., and Yakobi, R., Scorpion Sting, WebMD,, retrieved on 2008-10-25 
  59. 'Scorpion venom' attacks tumours, BBC News, 2006-07-30,, retrieved on 2008-10-25 
  60. Scorpion venom blocks bone loss, Harvard University,, retrieved on 2008-10-25 
  61. Lipper, G.M., "Lice, Mites, and Arachnid Bites", 59th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology,, retrieved on 2008-10-25 
  62. Potter, M.F., Parasitic Mites of Humans, University of Kentucky College of Agriculture,, retrieved on 2008-10-25 
  63. Jong, D.D., Morse, R.A., and Eickwort, G.C. (January 1982), "Mite Pests of Honey Bees", Annual Review of Entomology 27: 229–252, doi:10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.001305 
  64. Klenerman, Paul; Lipworth, Brian; authors, House dust mite allergy, NetDoctor,, retrieved on 2008-02-20 
  65. Osakabe, M. (2002), "Which predatory mite can control both a dominant mite pest, Tetranychus urticae, and a latent mite pest, Eotetranychus asiaticus, on strawberry?", Experimental & applied acarology 26 (3-4): 219–230, doi:10.1023/A:1021116121604 


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).