Individual differences |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |
In medicine, a clinical trial (synonyms: clinical studies, research protocols, medical research) is a research study.
Types of clinical trials
The most commonly performed clinical trials evaluate new drugs, medical devices, biologics, or other interventions to patients in strictly scientifically controlled settings, and are required for Food and Drug Administration approval of new therapies. Trials may be designed to assess the safety and efficacy of an experimental therapy, to assess whether the new intervention is better than standard therapy, or to compare the efficacy of two standard or marketed interventions.
To be ethical, they must involve the full and informed consent of participating human subjects. They are closely supervised by appropriate regulatory authorities. All interventional studies must be approved by an ethics committee before permission is granted to run the trial.
The study design that provides the most compelling evidence of a causal relationship between the treatment and the effect, is the randomized controlled trial. Studies in epidemiology such as the cohort study and the case-control study are clinical studies in that they involve human participants, but provide less compelling evidence than the randomized controlled trial. The major difference between clinical trials and epidemiological studies is that, in clinical trials, the investigators manipulate the administration of a new intervention and measure the effect of that manipulation, whereas epidemiological studies only observe associations (correlations) between the treatments experienced by participants and their health status or diseases.
Currently some Phase II and most Phase III drug trials are designed to be randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. This means that each study subject is randomly assigned to receive one of the treatments, which might be the placebo. Neither the subjects nor scientists involved in the study know which study treatment is being administered to any given subject; and, in particular, none of those involved in the study know which subjects are being administered a placebo. Of note, during the last ten years or so it has become a common practice to conduct "active comparator" trials (also known as "active control" trials) - in other words, when a treatment exists that is clearly better than doing nothing (i.e. the placebo) for the subject, the alternate treatment would be a standard-of-care therapy.
While the term clinical trials is most commonly associated with large randomized studies, many clinical trials are small. They may be initiated by single physicians or a small group of physicians, and are designed to test simple questions. Other clinical trials require large numbers of participants followed over long periods of time. It is sometimes necessary to organize multicenter trials. Often the centres taking part in such trials are in different countries (in which case they may be termed international clinical trials).
The number of patients enrolled in the study also has a large bearing on the ability of the trial to reliably detect an effect of a treatment. This is described as the "power" of the trial. It is usually expressed as the probability that, if the treatments differ in their effect on the outcome of interest, the statistical analysis of the trial data will detect that difference. The larger the sample size or number of participants, the greater the statistical power. However, in designing a clinical trial, this consideration must be balanced with the greater costs associated with larger studies. The power of a trial is not a single, unique value; it estimates the ability of a trial to detect a difference of a particular size (or larger) between the treated and control groups. For example, of a lipid-lowering drug with 100 patients per group, might have a power of .90 to detect a difference between active and placebo of 10 mg/dL or more, but only have a power of .70 to detect a difference of 5 mg/dL.
Pharmaceutical clinical trials are commonly classified into four phases, and the drug-development process will normally proceed through all four stages over many years. If the drug successfully passes through the first three phases, it will usually be successfully approved for use in the general population.
Phase I trials are the first-stage of testing in human subjects. Normally a small (20-80) group of healthy volunteers will be selected. This phase includes trials designed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a therapy. These trials are almost always conducted in an inpatient clinic, where the subject can be observed by full-time medical staff. The subject is usually observed until several half-lives of the drug have passed. Phase I trials also normally include dose-ranging studies such that doses for clinical use can be refined. The tested range of doses will usually be a small fraction of the dose that causes harm in animal testing. Phase I trials most often include healthy volunteers, however there are some circumstances when patients are used, such as with oncology (cancer) and HIV drug trials. In Phase I trials of new cancer drugs, for example, patients with advanced (metastatic) cancer are used. These trials are usually offered to patients who have had other types of therapy and who have few, if any, other treatment choices.
There are two specific kinds of Phase I trials - SAD studies, and MAD studies.
SAD - Single Ascending Dose studies are those in which groups of three or six patients are given a small dose of the drug and observed for a specific period of time. If they do not exhibit any adverse side effects, a new group of patients is then given a higher dose. This is continued until intolerable side effects start showing up, at which point the drug is said to have reached the Maximum tolerated dose (MTD).
MAD - Multiple Ascending Dose studies are conducted to better understand the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of the drug. In these studies, a group of patients receives a low dose of the drug and the dose is subsequently escalated upto a predetermined level. Samples (of blood, and other fluids) are collected at various time points and analyzed to understand how the drug is processed within the body.
Once the initial safety of the therapy has been confirmed in Phase I trials, Phase II trials are performed on larger groups (100-300) and are designed to assess clinical efficacy of the therapy; as well as to continue Phase I assessments in a larger group of volunteers and patients. The development process for a new drug commonly fails during Phase II trials due to the discovery of poor efficacy or toxic effects.
Phase III studies are large double-blind randomized controlled trials on large patient groups (1000-3000 or more) and are aimed at being the definitive assessment of the efficacy of the new therapy, especially in comparison with currently available alternatives. Phase III trials are the most expensive, time-consuming and difficult trials to design and run; especially in therapies for chronic conditions. Once a drug has proven satisfactory over Phase III trials, the trial results are usually combined into a large document containing a comprehensive description of the methods and results of human and animal studies, manufacturing procedures, formulation details, and shelf life. This collection of information makes up the "regulatory submission" that is provided for review to various regulatory authorities in different countries (such as the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) or the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States for marketing approval.
Phase IV trials involve the post-launch safety surveillance and ongoing technical support of a drug. Phase IV studies may be mandated by regulatory authorities or may be undertaken by the sponsoring company for competitive or other reasons. Post-launch safety surveillance is designed to detect any rare or long-term adverse effects over a much larger patient population and timescale than was possible during the initial clinical trials. Such adverse effects detected by Phase IV trials may result in the withdrawal or restriction of a drug - recent examples include cerivastatin (brand names Baycol and Lipobay), troglitazone (Rezulin) and rofecoxib (Vioxx).
- Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, Moore PK (2003). Pharmacology 5 ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 0-443-07145-4
- Finn R, (1999). "Cancer Clinical Trials: Experimental Treatments and How They Can Help You." Sebastopol: O'Reilly & Associates. ISBN 1-56592-566-1
- Clinical investigator
- Clinical monitoring
- Clinical protocol
- Clinical research associate
- Clinical trial protocol
- Clinical trials publication
- Drug development
- Pre-clinical development
- Multicenter trial
- What is a Clinical Trial? from National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health
- ClinicalTrials.gov from US National Library of Medicine
- Clinical Trial Network Provides an online searchable database of clinical investigators and the clinical trials they are conducting free to Sponsor Companies and individuals interested in participating in clinical trials
- Thomson CenterWatch Industry Sponsored Clinical Trial Listings
- The Cochrane collaboration
- Can context justify an ethical double standard for clinical research in developing countries?
- Examples on how to desing, conduct and analyze clinical trials
Biomedical research: Clinical study design / Design of experiments
(EBM I to II-1; A to B)
(EBM II-2 to II-3; B to C)
|Analysis of clinical trials|
|Interpretation of results|
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|