Assessment |
Biopsychology |
Comparative |
Cognitive |
Developmental |
Language |
Individual differences |
Personality |
Philosophy |
Social |
Methods |
Statistics |
Clinical |
Educational |
Industrial |
Professional items |
World psychology |
Philosophy Index: Aesthetics · Epistemology · Ethics · Logic · Metaphysics · Consciousness · Philosophy of Language · Philosophy of Mind · Philosophy of Science · Social and Political philosophy · Philosophies · Philosophers · List of lists
The three methods for logical reasoning, deduction, induction, and abduction can be explained in the following way (taken from [1]):
- Given α, β, and the rule R1 : α ∴ β
- Deduction is using the rule and its preconditions to make a conclusion (α ∧ R1 ⇒ β).
- Induction is learning R1 after numerous examples of β and α.
- Abduction is using the postcondition and the rule to assume that the precondition could explain the postcondition (β ∧ R1 ⇒ α).
See also[]
- Reason
- Logic
- Logical fallacy
- Reasoning
- Deductive reasoning
- Inductive reasoning
- Abductive reasoning
- Defeasible reasoning
References[]
[1] T. Menzies. Applications of Abduction: Knowledge-Level Modeling. November 1996.
fr:Concepts logiques zh:逻辑推理
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors). |
{{enWP|