Psychology Wiki

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Biological: Behavioural genetics · Evolutionary psychology · Neuroanatomy · Neurochemistry · Neuroendocrinology · Neuroscience · Psychoneuroimmunology · Physiological Psychology · Psychopharmacology (Index, Outline)



Neurofibromin 1 also known as neurofibromatosis-related protein NF-1 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the NF1 gene.[1] Mutations in the NF1 gene are associated with neurofibromatosis type I (also known as von Recklinghausen disease) and Watson syndrome.[2]


NF1 encodes the protein neurofibromin, which appears to be a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway.

NF1 is found within the mammalian postsynapse, where it is known to bind to the NMDA receptor complex. It has been found to lead to deficits in learning, and it is suspected that this is a result of its regulation of the Ras pathway. It is known to regulate the GTPase HRAS, causing the hydrolyzation of GTP and thereby inactivating it.[3] Within the synapse HRAS is known to activate Src, which itself phosphorylates GRIN2A, leading to its inclusion in the synaptic membrane.

NF1 is also known to interact with CASK through syndecan, a protein which is involved in the KIF17/ABPA1/CASK/LIN7A complex, which is involved in trafficking GRIN2B to the synapse. This suggests that NF1 has a role in the transportation of the NMDA receptor subunits to the synapse and its membrane. NF1 is also believed to be involved in the synaptic ATP-PKA-cAMP pathway, through modulation of adenylyl cyclase. It is also known to bind the caveolin 1, a protein which regualtes p21ras, PKC and growth response factors.[3]

Clinical significance

Mutations linked to neurofibromatosis type 1 led to the identification of the NF1 gene. The neurofibromin gene may be mutated in thousands of ways, resulting in many possible clinical outcomes.[4] In addition to neurofibromatosis type I, mutations in NF1 can also lead to juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, Watson syndrome,[5] and breast cancer.[6] Types of mutations include frameshift, nonsense, missense, splicing alteration and deletion mutations, and loss of heterozygosity.[7][8][9][10]

RNA editing


The type of editing is a cytidine to uridine (C to U) site specific deamination. The editing site in NF1 mRNA was determined to have a high homology to the ApoB editing site where double stranded mRNA undergoes editing by the ApoB holoenzyme.[11] This alluded to the same holoenzyme involved in ApoB mRNA editing maybe involved in editing of NF1.[12] There are at least four different alternatively spliced forms of the protein, two of which are better defined. They differ by the inclusion of exon 23A. Recent experiments have shown that apobec-1 is indeed expressed outside the GI luminal tract in some tumors and the inclusion of downstream exon 23a is preferentially found in these edited transcripts. These two features distinguishes them from tumors where RNA editing does not occur.[13]


The cytidine in the arginine codon (CGA) is deaminated to a uracil creating an inframe translational stop codon. The editing site is located at nucleotide position 2914.A region (nucleotides 2909-2930) was found to have a high homology to that found in the 21 nucleotide editing region of ApoB mRNA. It was suggested that the same editsome involved in ApoB mRNA editing may also be involved in NF1 mRNA editing. However the 6 nucleotide stretch from the edited cytidine and the start of the mooring sequence is two nucleotides longer than the ideal sequence required for ApoB mRNA editing. Also the region contains 2 guanidines which would be tolerated but again would not be ideal for ApoB mRNA editing. The mooring sequence and regulatory sequence are thought to be sufficient for editing to occur by ApoB mRNA editing machinery. This was determined by site mutagenesis experiments.[14]


NF1 RNA editing is not regulated by limited amounts of APOBEC-1. This implies that different factors are involved in NF1 mRNA editing than those associated with ApoB RNA editing. It is thought that different trans acting factors may be involved in the two editing processes.[11] Also, the region surrounding the editing region in NF1 mRNA is GC rich instead of the preferred AT rich sequence found in ApoB mRNA editing site. This reason as well as the longer spacer element of NF1 mRNA than that of ApoB mRNA are thought to be factors in the difference in frequency of editing of the two mRNAs (20% NF1, 90% ApoB).[15] Editing occurs in a higher frequency in tumours compared to the relative normal tissues.[11] There is a higher frequency of edting in the NF1 mRNA which includes Exon 23A in tumors.[13]


The editing site is thought not to be conserved as editing of NF1 mRNA does not occur in the rat or mouse but these species do express several alternatively spliced mRNAs.[11][16] One of these alternatively spliced isoforms known as TYPE III in rats and mice introduces a frameshift that introduces a stop codon by inclusion of a 41 base pair exon.[17]



Editing results in a codon change from an arginine codon (CGA) to an in frame stop codon (UGA) due to a base change at nucleotide 2914. The introduction of an inframe stop codon results in a translated protein that is truncated. The translated protein is thought to be lacking its GAP Related Domain (GRD) that shares a homology to mammalian GTPase activating (GAP) domain and yeast inhibitor of RAS protein 1 and 2 domains.[11]


The gene product is neurofibromin, a tumor-suppressor, a region of which functions as a GTPase-activating protein shown to be involved in negative regulation of the RAS pathway.[17][18] NF1 mRNA editing has been detected in a wide range of tissues. Editing results in a truncated protein being translated that does not contain this region. The GTPase region has a high homology to with mammalian and yeast (GAPs) which would suggest that neurofibromin plays a role in negative regulation of RAS signal transduction pathways. It is thought that editing therefore would result in the loss of the proteins tumour suppressor activity.[19][20][21] This corresponds to the observed increase in editing in tumors compared to normal tissue, however further research into the role of mRNA editing of NF1 mRNA in pathogenesis in tumours needs to be undertaked.[11][16] There is a correlation in an increase of editing in some tumors and the degree of malignancy of the tumor suggesting a relationship between the two.[17] Recently further evidence of the role of editing in pathogenesis in tumors.It was observed that C to U editing of NF1 mRNA occurs in a fraction of tumor samples of NF1 patients where APOBEC-1 is also expressed. This was an important find as was the first time APOBEC-1 expression was proven experimentally outside the luminal cells of the tract.[13] The N-terminus of the protein has a region demonstrated to be able to bind microtubules. It has been suggested that since the edited protein still retains this region, that a function of this editing is to displace microtubules from the full length neurofiromin protein. This would liberate the full length protein to interact with RAS.[16][22]


It is thought that RNA editing may account for the wide variation in phenotype of this condition even among siblings.[23] Also 50% of new cases have new mutations. The frequency is too high to explain these cases as spontaneous mutations therefore RNA editing of NF1 rna may provide an alternative reason for the variation of phenotype.[12]

Model organisms

Model organisms have been used in the study of NF1 function. A conditional knockout mouse line, called Nf1tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi[30][31] was generated as part of the International Knockout Mouse Consortium program, a high-throughput mutagenesis project to generate and distribute animal models of disease to interested scientists.[32][33][34]

Male and female animals underwent a standardized phenotypic screen to determine the effects of deletion.[28][35] Twenty six tests were carried out on mutant mice and four significant abnormalities were observed.[28] Over half the homozygous mutant embryos identified during gestation were dead, and in a separate study none survived until weaning. The remaining tests were carried out on heterozygous mutant adult mice: females displayed abnormal hair cycling while males had an decreased B cell number and an increased monocyte cell number.[28]


The neurofibromatosis gene was patented by the University of Michigan, with the initial filing in 1991 and the patent granted in 2001.[36]

See also

  • SPRED1 gene


  1. Skuse GR, Kosciolek BA, Rowley PT (September 1991). The neurofibroma in von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis has a unicellular origin. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 49 (3): 600–7.
  2. Rasmussen SA, Friedman JM (January 2000). NF1 gene and neurofibromatosis 1. Am. J. Epidemiol. 151 (1): 33–40.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Trovó-Marqui AB, Tajara EH (2006). Neurofibromin: a general outlook. Clin. Genet. 70 (1): 1–13.
  4. "NF1 mutations and molecular testing", by SA Thomson, L Fishbein and MR Wallace, J Child Neurol 2002 Aug; 17(8); 555-61; discussion 571-2, 646-51
  5. Entrez Gene: NF1 neurofibromin 1 (neurofibromatosis, von Recklinghausen disease, Watson disease).
  6. (2012). Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490 (7418): 61–70.
  7. Bottillo I (April 2009). Germline and somatic NF1 mutations in sporadic and NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. J. Pathol. 217 (5): 693–701.
  8. "Nf1 tumor suppressor in skin:: Expression in response to tissue trauma and in cellular differentiation"
  9. PMID 10677298 (PMID 10677298)
    Citation will be completed automatically in a few minutes. Jump the queue or expand by hand
  10. DOI:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.07.005
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 Skuse GR, Cappione AJ, Sowden M, Metheny LJ, Smith HC (February 1996). The neurofibromatosis type I messenger RNA undergoes base-modification RNA editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 24 (3): 478–85.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Skuse GR, Ludlow JW (April 1995). Tumour suppressor genes in disease and therapy. Lancet 345 (8954): 902–6.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Mukhopadhyay D, Anant S, Lee RM, Kennedy S, Viskochil D, Davidson NO (January 2002). C-->U editing of neurofibromatosis 1 mRNA occurs in tumors that express both the type II transcript and apobec-1, the catalytic subunit of the apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70 (1): 38–50.
  14. Backus JW, Smith HC (November 1992). Three distinct RNA sequence elements are required for efficient apolipoprotein B (apoB) RNA editing in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 20 (22): 6007–14.
  15. Driscoll DM, Zhang Q (August 1994). Expression and characterization of p27, the catalytic subunit of the apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 269 (31): 19843–7.
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 Skuse GR, Cappione AJ (1997). RNA processing and clinical variability in neurofibromatosis type I (NF1). Hum. Mol. Genet. 6 (10): 1707–12.
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 Cappione AJ, French BL, Skuse GR (February 1997). A potential role for NF1 mRNA editing in the pathogenesis of NF1 tumors. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60 (2): 305–12.
  18. Cichowski K, Jacks T (February 2001). NF1 tumor suppressor gene function: narrowing the GAP. Cell 104 (4): 593–604.
  19. Brannan CI, Perkins AS, Vogel KS, Ratner N, Nordlund ML, Reid SW, Buchberg AM, Jenkins NA, Parada LF, Copeland NG (May 1994). Targeted disruption of the neurofibromatosis type-1 gene leads to developmental abnormalities in heart and various neural crest-derived tissues. Genes Dev. 8 (9): 1019–29.
  20. Ballester R, Marchuk D, Boguski M, Saulino A, Letcher R, Wigler M, Collins F (November 1990). The NF1 locus encodes a protein functionally related to mammalian GAP and yeast IRA proteins. Cell 63 (4): 851–9.
  21. Xu GF, O'Connell P, Viskochil D, Cawthon R, Robertson M, Culver M, Dunn D, Stevens J, Gesteland R, White R (August 1990). The neurofibromatosis type 1 gene encodes a protein related to GAP. Cell 62 (3): 599–608.
  22. Gregory PE, Gutmann DH, Mitchell A, Park S, Boguski M, Jacks T, Wood DL, Jove R, Collins FS (May 1993). Neurofibromatosis type 1 gene product (neurofibromin) associates with microtubules. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 19 (3): 265–74.
  23. Huson SM, Compston DA, Clark P, Harper PS (November 1989). A genetic study of von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis in south east Wales. I. Prevalence, fitness, mutation rate, and effect of parental transmission on severity. J. Med. Genet. 26 (11): 704–11.
  24. Dysmorphology data for Nf1. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
  25. Peripheral blood lymphocytes data for Nf1. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
  26. Salmonella infection data for Nf1. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
  27. Citrobacter infection data for Nf1. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
  28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 28.3 Gerdin AK (2010). The Sanger Mouse Genetics Programme: High throughput characterisation of knockout mice. Acta Ophthalmologica 88 (S248): 0.
  29. Mouse Resources Portal, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
  30. International Knockout Mouse Consortium.
  31. Mouse Genome Informatics.
  32. PMID 21677750 (PMID 21677750)
    Citation will be completed automatically in a few minutes. Jump the queue or expand by hand
  33. Dolgin E (June 2011). Mouse library set to be knockout. Nature 474 (7351): 262–3.
  34. Collins FS, Rossant J, Wurst W (January 2007). A mouse for all reasons. Cell 128 (1): 9–13.
  35. van der Weyden L, White JK, Adams DJ, Logan DW (2011). The mouse genetics toolkit: revealing function and mechanism. Genome Biol 12 (6): 224.
  36. United States Patent US006238861B1

Further reading

  • Upadhyaya M, Shaw DJ, Harper PS (1994). Molecular basis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): mutation analysis and polymorphisms in the NF1 gene. Hum. Mutat. 4 (2): 83–101.
  • Shen MH, Harper PS, Upadhyaya M (1996). Molecular genetics of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). J. Med. Genet. 33 (1): 2–17.
  • Feldkamp MM, Gutmann DH, Guha A (1998). Neurofibromatosis type 1: piecing the puzzle together. The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques 25 (3): 181–91.
  • Hamilton SJ, Friedman JM (2001). Insights into the pathogenesis of neurofibromatosis 1 vasculopathy. Clin. Genet. 58 (5): 341–4.
  • Baralle D, Baralle M (2006). Splicing in action: assessing disease causing sequence changes. J. Med. Genet. 42 (10): 737–48.
  • Mensink KA (2006). Connective tissue dysplasia in five new patients with NF1 microdeletions: further expansion of phenotype and review of the literature. J. Med. Genet. 43 (2): e8.
  • Trovó-Marqui AB, Tajara EH (2006). Neurofibromin: a general outlook. Clin. Genet. 70 (1): 1–13.

External links

Template:PDB Gallery Template:GTP-binding protein regulators Template:Tumor suppressor genes Template:Use dmy dates

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).