Psychology Wiki

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Cognitive Psychology: Attention · Decision making · Learning · Judgement · Memory · Motivation · Perception · Reasoning · Thinking  - Cognitive processes Cognition - Outline Index

This article is in need of attention from a psychologist/academic expert on the subject.
Please help recruit one, or improve this page yourself if you are qualified.
This banner appears on articles that are weak and whose contents should be approached with academic caution


Noise effects are the behavioral, physiological and psychological outcome of noise.


Roadway noise is a major source of exposure

Noise health effects are the health consequences of elevated sound levels. Elevated workplace or other noise can cause hearing impairment, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, annoyance, sleep disturbance, and decreased school performance. Changes in the immune system and birth defects have been attributed to noise exposure, but evidence is limited.[1] Although some presbycusis may occur naturally with age,[2] in many developed nations the cumulative impact of noise is sufficient to impair the hearing of a large fraction of the population over the course of a lifetime.[3][4] Noise exposure has also been known to induce tinnitus, hypertension, vasoconstriction and other cardiovascular impacts.[5] Beyond these effects, elevated noise levels can create stress, increase workplace accident rates, and stimulate aggression and other anti-social behaviors.[6] The most significant causes are vehicle and aircraft noise, prolonged exposure to loud music, and industrial noise.

Hearing loss

Main article: Noise-induced hearing loss

The mechanism of hearing loss arises from trauma to stereocilia of the cochlea, the principal fluid filled structure of the inner ear.[How to reference and link to summary or text] The pinna combined with the middle ear amplifies sound pressure levels by a factor of twenty, so that extremely high sound pressure levels arrive in the cochlea, even from moderate atmospheric sound stimuli. Underlying pathology to the cochlea are reactive oxygen species, which play a significant role in noise-induced necrosis and apoptosis of the stereocilia.[7] Exposure to high levels of noise have differing effects within a given population, and the involvement of reactive oxygen species suggests possible avenues to treat or prevent damage to hearing and related cellular structures.[7]

The elevated sound levels cause trauma to the cochlear structure in the inner ear, which gives rise to irreversible hearing loss.[8] A very loud sound in a particular frequency range can damage the cochlea's hair cells that respond to that range thereby reducing the ear's ability to hear those frequencies in the future.[9] However, loud noise in any frequency range has deleterious effects across the entire range of human hearing.[10] The outer ear (visible portion of the human ear) combined with the middle ear amplifies sound levels by a factor of 20 when sound reaches the inner ear.[11]

Hearing loss is somewhat inevitable with age. Though older males exposed to significant occupational noise demonstrate significantly reduced hearing sensitivity than their non-exposed peers, differences in hearing sensitivity decrease with time and the two groups are indistinguishable by age 79.[2] Women exposed to occupational noise do not differ from their peers in hearing sensitivity, though they do hear better than their non-exposed male counterparts. Due to loud music and a generally noisy environment, young people in the United States have a rate of impaired hearing 2.5 times greater than their parents and grandparents, with an estimated 50 million individuals with impaired hearing estimated in 2050.[3]

In Rosen's work on health effects and hearing loss, one of his findings derived from tracking Maaban tribesmen, who were insignificantly exposed to transportation or industrial noise. This population was systematically compared by cohort group to a typical U.S. population. The findings proved that aging is an almost insignificant cause of hearing loss, which instead is associated with chronic exposure to moderately high levels of environmental noise.[8]

Cardiovascular effects

Noise has been associated with important cardiovascular health problems.[12] In 1999, the World Health Organization concluded that the available evidence showed suggested a weak association between long-term noise exposure above 67-70 dB(A) and hypertension.[13] More recent studies have suggested that noise levels of 50 dB(A) at night may also increase the risk of myocardial infarction by chronically elevating cortisol production.[14][15][16]

Fairly typical roadway noise levels are sufficient to constrict arterial blood flow and lead to elevated blood pressure; in this case, it appears that a certain fraction of the population is more susceptible to vasoconstriction. This may result because annoyance from the sound causes elevated adrenaline levels trigger a narrowing of the blood vessels (vasoconstriction), or independently through medical stress reactions. Other effects of high noise levels are increased frequency of headaches, fatigue, stomach ulcers and vertigo.[17]

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency authored a pamphlet in 1978 that suggested a correlation between low-birthweight babies (using the World Health Organization definition of less than 2,500 g (~5.5 lb) and high sound levels, and also correlations in abnormally high rates of birth defects, where expectant mothers are exposed to elevated sound levels, such as typical airport environs. Specific birth abnormalities included harelip, cleft palate, and defects in the spine. According to Lester W. Sontag of The Fels Research Institute (as presented in the same EPA study): “There is ample evidence that environment has a role in shaping the physique, behavior and function of animals, including man, from conception and not merely from birth. The fetus is capable of perceiving sounds and responding to them by motor activity and cardiac rate change." Noise exposure is deemed to be particularly pernicious when it occurs between 15 and 60 days after conception, when major internal organs and the central nervous system are formed. Later developmental effects occur as vasoconstriction in the mother reduces blood flow and hence oxygen and nutrition to the fetus. Low birth weights and noise were also associated with lower levels of certain hormones in the mother, these hormones being thought to affect fetal growth and to be a good indicator of protein production. The difference between the hormone levels of pregnant mothers in noisy versus quiet areas increased as birth approached.


Because some stressful effects depend on qualities of the sound other than its absolute decibel value, the annoyance associated with sound may need to be considered in regard to health effects. For example, noise from airports is typically perceived as more bothersome than noise from traffic of equal volume.[18] Annoyance effects of noise are minimally affected by demographics, but fear of the noise source and sensitivity to noise both strongly affect the 'annoyance' of a noise.[19] Even sound levels as low as 40 dB(A) (about as loud as a refrigerator or library[20]) can generate noise complaints[21] and the lower threshold for noise producing sleep disturbance is 45 dB(A) or lower.[22] Other factors that affect the 'annoyance level' of sound include beliefs about noise prevention and the importance of the noise source, and annoyance at the cause (i.e. non-noise related factors) of the noise.[23] Evidence regarding the impact of long-term noise versus recent changes in ongoing noise is equivocal on its impact on annoyance.[23]

Estimates of sound annoyance typically rely on weighting filters, which consider some sound frequencies to be more important than others based on their presumed audibility to the human ear. The older dB(A) weighting filter described above is used widely in the U.S., but underestimates the impact of frequencies around 6000 Hz and at very low frequencies. The newer ITU-R 468 noise weighting filter is used more widely in Europe. The propagation of sound varies between environments; for example, low frequencies typically carry over longer distances. Therefore different filters, such as dB(B) and dB(C), may be recommended for specific situations.

When young children are exposed to speech interference levels of noise on a regular basis (the actual volume of which varies depending on distance and loudness of the speaker), there may develop speech or reading difficulties, because auditory processing functions are compromised.[How to reference and link to summary or text] In particular the writing learning impairment known as dysgraphia is commonly associated with environmental stressors in the classroom.[How to reference and link to summary or text] The effect of high noise levels on small children has been known to cause physical health damages as well. Children from noisy residences often possess a heart rate that is significantly higher (by 2 beats/min on average) than in children from noisy residences. [24]


Main article: Noise regulation

Environmental noise regulations usually specify a maximum outdoor noise level of 60 to 65 dB(A), while occupational safety organizations recommend that the maximum exposure to noise is 40 hours per week at 85 to 90 dB(A). For every additional 3 dB(A), the maximum exposure time is reduced by a factor 2, e.g. 20 hours per week at 88 dB(A). Sometimes, a factor of two per additional 5 dB(A) is used. However, these occupational regulations are acknowledged by the health literature as inadequate to protect against hearing loss and other health effects.

See also


  1. Passchier-Vermeer W, Passchier WF (2000). Noise exposure and public health. Environ. Health Perspect. 108 Suppl 1: 123–31.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Rosenhall U, Pedersen K, Svanborg A (1990). Presbycusis and noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear 11 (4): 257–63.
  3. 3.0 3.1 includeonly>Schmid, RE. "Aging nation faces growing hearing loss", CBS News, 2007-02-18. Retrieved on 2007-02-18. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Schmid" defined multiple times with different content
  4. Senate Public Works Committee, Noise Pollution and Abatement Act of 1972, S. Rep. No. 1160, 92nd Cong. 2nd session
  5. Noise: Health Effects and Controls. University of California, Berkeley. URL accessed on 2007-12-22.
  6. Kryter, Karl D. (1994). The handbook of hearing and the effects of noise: physiology, psychology, and public health, Boston: Academic Press.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Henderson D, Bielefeld EC, Harris KC, Hu BH (2006). The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear 27 (1): 1–19.
  8. 8.0 8.1 S. Rosen and P. Olin, Hearing Loss and Coronary Heart Disease, Archives of Otolaryngology, 82:236 (1965)
  9. HeadWize - Article: Preventing Hearing Damage When Listening With Headphones (A HeadWize Headphone Guide)
  10. High-Frequency Hearing Loss Incurred by Exposure to Low-Frequency Noise
  11. Noise: A Health Problem United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control, Washington, DC 20460, August, 1978
  12. Ising H, Babisch W, Kruppa B (1999). Noise-Induced Endocrine Effects and Cardiovascular Risk. Noise Health 1 (4): 37–48.
  13. Berglund, B, Lindvall T, Schwela D, Goh KT (1999). World Health Organization: Guidelines for Community Noise. World Health Organization.
  14. Maschke C (2003). Stress Hormone Changes in Persons exposed to Simulated Night Noise. Noise Health 5 (17): 35–45.
  15. Franssen EA, van Wiechen CM, Nagelkerke NJ, Lebret E (2004). Aircraft noise around a large international airport and its impact on general health and medication use. Occup Environ Med 61 (5): 405–13.
  16. Lercher P, Hörtnagl J, Kofler WW (1993). Work noise annoyance and blood pressure: combined effects with stressful working conditions. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65 (1): 23–8.
  17. Noise: A Health Problem United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control, Washington, DC 20460, August, 1978
  18. Miedema and Oudshoorn 2001 cited in Hypertension and exposure to noise near airports. Medscape.
  19. Miedema HME, Vos H. Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (6): 3336–44.
  20. [1.pdf Noise Facts and Figures!]. (PDF) Chiltern District Council. URL accessed on 2007-12-13.
  21. Gelfand, Stanley A. Essentials of Audiology, New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
  22. Walker, JR; Fahy, Frank (1998). Fundamentals of noise and vibration, London: E & FN Spon.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Field, JM (1993). Effect of personal and situational variables upon noise annoyance in residential areas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93 (5): 2753–63.
  24. Goran, Belojevic, et. al.. Urban Road Traffic Noise and Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Preschool Children. Environment International 34 (2): 226-231.

External links

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).