Assessment |
Biopsychology |
Comparative |
Cognitive |
Developmental |
Language |
Individual differences |
Personality |
Philosophy |
Social |
Methods |
Statistics |
Clinical |
Educational |
Industrial |
Professional items |
World psychology |
Clinical: Approaches · Group therapy · Techniques · Types of problem · Areas of specialism · Taxonomies · Therapeutic issues · Modes of delivery · Model translation project · Personal experiences ·
The "psychological immune system" is a shorthand term used to encompass a number of biases and cognitive mechanisms that protect the subject from experiencing extreme negative emotions.[1][2] They achieve this by ignoring, transforming or constructing information, making the existing state of affairs more bearable while decreasing the appeal of the alternatives.[3] They operate largely or entirely outside conscious awareness. Psychologists Daniel Gilbert and Timothy D. Wilson coined the term, using the biological immune system as a metaphor for these processes.[4]
Mechanisms[]
The psychological immune system includes:[1][5]
- ego defense
- rationalization
- dissonance reduction
- motivated reasoning
- self-serving attribution
- self-affirmation
- self-deception
- terror management
- Fading affect bias: a bias in which the emotion associated with unpleasant memories fades more quickly than the emotion associated with positive events.[6]
Bias in affective forecasting[]
- Main article: Affective forecasting
The mechanisms of the psychological immune system act without conscious awareness, so people usually fail to anticipate its effects. This is one reason why people are surprisingly poor at affective forecasting: predicting how they will feel in possible future situations. People typically overestimate the extent of the effect that a negative event, such as the death of a relative or a job loss, will have on them.[4][1]
See also[]
Further reading[]
- Fiske, Susan T. (2004). Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology, Wiley.
- Gilbert, Daniel T. (2006). Stumbling on happiness, Alfred A. Knopf.
- Wilson, Timothy D. (2002). Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
References[]
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Gilbert, D.T., Blumberg, S.J., Pinel, E.C., Wilson, T.D., and Wheatley, T.P, (1998) "Immune Neglect: A Source of Durability Bias in Affective Forecasting" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 17, No. 3 pp. 617-638
- ↑ Gilbert, Daniel T., Jane E. J. Ebert (2002). Decisions and Revisions: The Affective Forecasting of Changeable Outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (4): 503–514.
- ↑ Kay, Aaron C., Maria C. Jimenez, Joim T. Jost (2002). Sour Grapes, Sweet Lemons, and the Anticipatory Rationalization of the Status Quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (9): 1300–13 12.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 includeonly>Gertner, Jon. "The Futile Pursuit of Happiness", New York Times, September 7, 2003. Retrieved on 2009-08-29. “Gilbert says. "We've used the metaphor of the 'psychological immune system' -- it's just a metaphor, but not a bad one for that system of defenses that helps you feel better when bad things happen."”
- ↑ Wilson, Timothy D.; Daniel T. Gilbert (2003). "Affective Forecasting" Mark P. Zanna Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 380, Academic Press.
- ↑ Walker, W. Richard, John J. Skowronski, Charles P. Thompson (2003). Life Is Pleasant—and Memory Helps to Keep It That Way!. Review of General Psychology 7 (2): 203–210.
External links[]
- Daniel Gilbert "Why are we happy?" (video lecture), TED.com, Retrieved 2009-08-29
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors). |