Psychology Wiki

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Professional Psychology: Debating Chamber · Psychology Journals · Psychologists

Scientific literature comprises scientific publications that report original empirical and theoretical work in the natural and social sciences, and is often abbreviated as the literature. Academic publishing is the process of placing the results of one's research into the literature.

Types of scientific publications

Scientific literature can include the following kinds of publications:

  • scientific articles published in scientific journals
  • patents specialized for science and technology (for example, biological patents and chemical patents)
  • books wholly written by one or a small number of authors being scientists
  • books, where each chapter is the responsibility of a different author or set of authors, though the editor may take some responsibility for ensuring consistency of style and content
  • presentations at academic conferences, especially those organized by learned societies
  • government reports
  • scientific publications on the World Wide Web
  • books, technical reports, pamphlets, and working papers issued by individual researchers or research organisations on their own initiative; these are sometimes organised into a series

The importance of these different components of the literature varies between disciplines and has changed over time. As of 2005, the standing of journal article publication is the highest in almost all disciplines (though journals vary very greatly in their prestige and importance) and that of working papers and World Wide Web publications is the lowest (with some important exceptions, however). The standing of book publications is highly variable.

The quality of content

Ultimately, it is not the format that is important, but what lies behind it - the content. Several key requirements need to be met before an outlet can be regarded as forming a part of the literature.

  1. The format should be archival, in the sense that libraries should be able to store and catalogue the documents and scientists years later should be able to recover any document in order to study and assess it, and there should be an established way of citing the document so that formal reference can be made to them in future scientific publication. The lack of an established archival system is one of the hurdles that World Wide Web based scientific publication has to overcome; significant progress is now being made on this front.
  2. The content should be presented in the context of previous scientific investigations, by citation of relevant documents in the existing literature.
  3. Empirical techniques, and the results of the investigation, should be described in such a way that a subsequent scientist, with appropriate knowledge of and experience in the relevant field, should be able to repeat the observations and know whether he or she has obtained the same result.
  4. The conclusions drawn should be based on previous literature and/or new empirical results, in such a way that any reader with knowledge of the field can follow the argument and confirm that the conclusions are sound. That is, acceptance of the conclusions must not depend on personal authority, rhetorical skill, or faith.

Peer review

Peer review and the learned journal format are convenient ways of ensuring that the above fundamental criteria are met, rather than being in themselves essential to scientific literature.

The lack of peer review is what makes most technical reports and World Wide Web publications unacceptable as contributions to the literature. The relatively weak peer review often applied to books and chapters in edited books means that their status is doubtful, unless an author's personal standing is so high that his or her prior career provides an effective guarantee of quality. Formal peer review is in flux and likely to change fundamentally owing to the emergence of institutional digital repositories where scholars can post their work as it is submitted to a print-based journal.

Increasing reliance on abstracting services, especially on those available electronically, means that the effective criterion for whether a publication format forms part of the literature is whether it is covered by these services; in particular, by the specialised service for the discipline concerned such as Chemical Abstracts Service, and by the major interdisciplinary services such as those marketed by the Institute for Scientific Information.

See also


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).